Make the case for AI

No budget, no mandate, and you are doing it anyway

What you and your colleagues have already built is a list anybody can open. It argues better than a business case you wrote on your own.

Powered By

The Challenge

You believe in this and you are not the person who signs anything
The people who could approve it want evidence, and evidence is exactly what you do not have
You can describe what you did with AI. You cannot show it to anybody
Every case you make comes out sounding like enthusiasm rather than an argument
The dashboards that would prove your point are the ones your account cannot open

The Runwork Solution

What is running across the workspace is a list you can open without being an admin
A skill shows who made it and how many times the team has used it, which is evidence rather than opinion
You can hand somebody a whole AI conversation, so they read the work instead of your summary of it
What you save reaches your colleagues without anybody approving a rollout first
You can point at things running today rather than at a plan for things that might

What your team gets

A list, not a slide

The workflows and scheduled work running in your workspace right now. You did not compile it, you opened it, and it is harder to argue with than a deck.

Evidence somebody else generated

A skill you did not write, made by a colleague, used eleven times by other people. That is the sentence that changes the conversation, and none of it is your opinion.

The conversation you can forward

Rather than explaining what the AI did, you hand over the conversation itself. The person reads what actually happened instead of your account of it.

Proof that spreads while you wait

What you save reaches your colleagues whether or not anybody has approved anything. By the time you get the meeting, other people are already using it.

The thing you do this week

Save one skill for the thing you do most often, and let a colleague use it. That is a smaller ask than a pilot and it produces the evidence a pilot was supposed to produce.

What you cannot show them

The adoption dashboard and the reports are limited to workspace owners and admins, so they are not your ammunition. What is running, and who built it, is.

A Day in the Life

You are not the person who decides. You are the person who worked out that this matters, and the meeting you need is with somebody who has not. That is the actual problem, and it is not solved by being more convinced.

Monday. You save one skill. The thing you do most weeks, saved once rather than done again. It costs you the twenty minutes you were going to spend doing it anyway.

Wednesday. Somebody else uses it. A colleague runs it without asking you how, because it reached their AI on its own. You did not train anybody and nobody approved anything.

Two weeks later. It is not just you. The skill has been used by four people. You can see who made what across the workspace, and it is no longer a story about your enthusiasm.

The meeting. You do not open a deck. You open the list of what is running, and you forward one conversation showing the work itself. The argument is that this is already happening, which is a different argument from asking to try.

And if the answer is still no. The skills are saved, the work still runs, and your colleagues keep using it. You lost a meeting rather than the thing you built.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can I actually show somebody who has to approve this?

Three things, and none of them needs admin access. The list of workflows, scheduled work and agents running in your workspace right now. The skills your colleagues have saved, each showing who made it and how many times the team has used it. And a whole AI conversation, forwarded, so they read the work instead of your description of it.

I am not an admin. What can I not see?

The team dashboard and the reports inside it are limited to workspace owners and admins, so adoption scores and the savings reports are not available to you and are not your argument. What is open to every member is what is actually running and what people have built, which is the more persuasive half anyway.

How do I start without asking permission?

Save one skill for the thing you already do most often. It reaches your colleagues' AI tools without a rollout, an announcement or an approval, and the evidence it produces is other people using it. That is a smaller commitment than a pilot and it generates the thing a pilot is usually run to generate.

What if my company has already standardised on a different AI tool?

Then keep using it. This sits underneath whichever tools people already opened, so nothing here asks anybody to switch, and "we would have to change tools" is not an objection you have to answer. That also makes the ask smaller, which matters when you are the one asking.

What is the smallest thing I can do this week?

Save one skill and tell one colleague it exists. If they use it, you have evidence. If they do not, you have learned something about which problem was worth solving, and it cost you twenty minutes rather than a business case.

Related Use Cases

A Place to Start Learn From Teammates Work That Runs

Start keeping what your team figures out.

Start a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Start Free Trial Explore More Use Cases